Jump to content

Talk:Al-Khwarizmi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You can’t just delete people opinions about his Arabian origins

[edit]

Another example of stealing Arabian famous figures like Saladin who was an Arabian leader who spoke Arabic as we can easily read from his speeches that historians copy in books and on his currency , and his family member who was ruler for a century after him all had confirmed that they are Arabic but still Wikipedia address him as Kurdish not Arabic. in this example al-Khwarizmi was in Baghdad speaks only Arabic never wrote a book in Persian , there is no one single evidence of his Persian roots except that he was born in Uzbekistan (not Persia) which was part of Arabian empire with many Arabs family traveled there so he may be Arabian or Uzbekistanian more than to be Persian , still Wikipedia doesn’t let people to correct this misleading information about those Arabic stolen figures. so I am here just to make sure that someone mention this information “But he was Arabian” Jaffar algaragoly (talk) 09:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC) Jaffar algaragoly (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don’t believe in evidence to support your claim of stealing Arabian figures , at least have the decency to accept people’s different opinions on the subject, as long as we provide evidence
no wonder Wikipedia is not trusted as a scientific reference , because editors like you who corrupted it and deceived all the facts and truths Jaffar algaragoly (talk) 20:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
no wonder Wikipedia is not trusted as a scientific reference , because editors like you who corrupted it and deceived all the facts and truths
This is quite ironic. This article is sourced with WP:RS - your claims are based on your own opinion. In fact, WP:RS even goes against your claims, eg "In Central Asia, the meaning of previously-existing group names was changed and given an ethnic content. Some groups were declared part of the Uzbek nation, and the boundaries of an entity called “Uzbekistan” (which had never existed before) were delimited (Carlisle 1991b, p.24). - page 1991, Power, Networks and Violent Conflict in Central Asia: A Comparison of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, Routledge HistoryofIran (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok , now we are friends , please take time to reply and discuss with me about my opinions instead of just deleting my comments
Then I can show you more evidence, but if you keep deleting people opinions it’s just make things worse Jaffar algaragoly (talk) 21:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't delete your comment, but I probably should have per WP:SOAPBOX/WP:FORUM. And no, I'm not discussing your opinions with you, since we base our info on WP:RS (as u have already been told several times). HistoryofIran (talk) 22:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Al Khawarzami was a Shia Muslim

[edit]

Al Khawarzami was a Shia Muslim and he was taught everything he knew by Imam Ali al Naqi the 10th Shia Imam. The reason Imam al Naqi was never mentioned in his contemporary history is that in that case he would have been killed by the rivals of Imam Al Naqi who were in power at the time i.e, Al Mamun the Abbasid. 154.192.19.25 (talk) 17:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]