Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Dominguez

Ricardo Dominguez was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP as redirect to Toywar. Rossami 21:37, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

155 Google hits for "Ricardo Dominguez toywar," so it's legit. But, is it notable? Not much here to go on, and the contributor seems to be relying too much on the external links. - Lucky 6.9 18:03, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Comment: RTmark, Voteauction and Toywar are by the same contrib. - Lucky 6.9 18:08, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable. --Diberri | Talk 18:23, Aug 13, 2004 (UTC)
Merge & Redirect to toywar. If there has to be something, it should be in the lemma that will be most likely to be searched. In fact, I'm inclined to say that one article ought to be enough for the whole tribe (except Voteauction, which I think should be deleted for irrelevance to much of anything at all, including "future historians"). Geogre 20:23, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Ricardo.Dominguez electronic.disturbance.theater gives 767 hits, among them mentions by CNN, Wired, Salon, Telepolis and El País. Also it seems he's not only known for "toywar". I'm more inclined to keeping. regards, High on a tree 21:12, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Sounds OK to me. Merge and redirect, but delete "Voteauction." - Lucky 6.9 21:27, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: We'll need a separate nomination for Voteauction. Geogre 02:15, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.