Talk:Reading East (UK Parliament constituency)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixing-up and reverting changes by 80N
[edit]This article has been rewritten by what I shall, giving the benefit of the doubt, assume is a bot that wasn't really intended to deal with those constituencies that already had reasonable articles.
I'm making the following changes:
- Remove unnecessary disambiguation header
- Remove statement It elects one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election. as this is true of all UK constituencies and doesn't need repeating 600-odd times
- Remove {{sect-stub}} from section on boundaries; this is a full list of the wards and parishes in the constituency
- Remove {{expand list}} from section 'Member of Parliament'; how can you possibly expand the list when it contains the one and only MP.
- Put the 1997 results into the same template format as the 2001 results, so the contrast doesn't look so manky.
...............................
- Comment on point 2 in the unsigned post above. I am not sure we can assume that every reader of a constituency article will realise that the UK elects one member per constituency, by first past the post. It is true that most UK constituencies since 1885 and all since 1950 have only had one seat. However this was not necessarily the case before 1950 and may change in the future. Similarly the electoral systems used for earlier multi-member seats differed from first past the post in a single member constituency (bloc vote, limited vote and single transferable vote have been used in the past). Further change to the electoral system is by no means impossible in the next Parliament or two. However having made these points I do not feel any need to revert this particular article, but I would not delete the number of MPs and electoral systems note as a general rule. --Gary J 19:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Reading East (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040913122636/http://politics.guardian.co.uk:80/hoc/constituency/0,9338,-1237,00.html to http://politics.guardian.co.uk/hoc/constituency/0,9338,-1237,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Demographic and Economic Profile
[edit]This section would appear to have been added in response to the change of MP at the 2017 General Election. Although - based on my local knowledge - it would appear to be broadly accurate, it makes some rather sweeping assertions and, as already noted by Chris j Wood, it is wholly unsupported by relevant citations to outside sources. Unless the more sweeping and subjective assertions are deleted, and those that are retained are supported by verifiable citations, the section really should be deleted.Ntmr (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed - chris_j_wood (talk) 16:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Reading East (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://electionweb.co.uk/Bp/P83472.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325144621/http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2001/rp01-054.pdf to http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2001/rp01-054.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)