User talk:Bart van der Pligt~enwiki

Hallo, zo te zien ben je al een tijdje hier bezig, dus de standaard "welcome" tekst niet echt nodig. Net je toevoegingen aan ThvG gezien. Zeer nuttig; er is soms een hoop onzin over hem geschreven, hier ook. Groet, -- Viajero 16:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt dat je de vlooienkam er even doorheen gehaald hebt. Bart van der Pligt 16:16, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ondes Martenot

Thank you very much for your information - on both things! I'd better doublecheck what links to my English talk pages I have put on other wikipedias... / Habj 09:56, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Greetings, from looking at your edit it seems that all of the points you edited in are made later in the article. As it stands now the intro is technically correct. Perhaps you could edit for clarity in the May 2006 events section? Thanks. Netscott 17:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The intro is not correct.

Government officials have not announced she 'could lose' Dutch citizenship.

They announced that she _has no_ Dutch citizenship.

Bart van der Pligt 17:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly self-revert, unless something has changed since Verdonk herself announced that Hirsi Ali still had her citizenship at least until the end of the six week period. Netscott 17:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your saying that this line: "Hirsi Ali still has six weeks to react to this before any final decision about her citizenship is taken" from the article is false? Netscott 17:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's true they intially announced that but what did the government do later? Netscott 17:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The government, represented by Minister Verdonk, had a long debate with Parliament. In this debate Verdonk made several conflicting statements, adding even more confusion. One of these statements was that Hirsi Ali 'still has her citizenship'. I guess she meant 'Hirsi Ali still has a Dutch passport'. The government's position is that Hirsi Ali has never had Dutch citizenship and therefore her passport will be withdrawn in six weeks time.

The result of the debate was that Parliament forced Verdonk to reconsider the 'never had citizenship' part. Verdonk conceded (she will 'look into it') but meanwhile tried to convince the tv viewer that she was as firm and resulute as ever and had not made any mistake at all. Hence, in my opinion, her confusing statements. Bart van der Pligt 18:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I've edited the summary accordingly. Netscott 18:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Winston Bogarde

~~{{nothanks|Winston Bogarde|http://www.ave-it.net/Football%20Transfer%20flops.htm}}~~ --F. Cosoleto 19:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(The accusations in the above are false. I've explained so on the user's talk page - Bart van der Pligt 11:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

My apologies for that. I have put in talk page the notification copyviol template too hasty. In Italian Wikipedia every week we (me, Giacomo, and others) delete hundreds of violations, please be patient when one error occur. Regards, --F. Cosoleto 15:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies too... Bye! --Gia.cossa 16:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies accepted. Keep up the good work. Bart van der Pligt 16:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Brel la valse a mille temps.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brel la valse a mille temps.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brel la valse a mille temps.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brel la valse a mille temps.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bart van der Pligt. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bart van der Pligt~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

10:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)