User talk:Oldadamml

Srebrenica massacre

You should bring all these points up on the talk, and if apropriate make a temporary copy of the article. It is not apropriate for me to edit an article while it is protected - see Wikipedia:Protection policy. Thryduulf 07:31, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

VfD

Are you willing to reconsider your vote on Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Inheritance_(computer_science)? If you compare it with Inheritance_(object-oriented_programming) and Inheritance_(genetic algorithm) you will see that this article is inferior to it. Cheers, --R.Koot 12:40, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Srebrenica massacre: Chronological?

What do you think of arranging data chronological in the article, like I tried in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Srebrenica_massacre&oldid=20267126 You can see that version of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Srebrenica_massacre&oldid=20332217 is not chronological (in the period 11 aug - 13 aug), first some things which happend on 12 aug, later some things which happend on 11 aug. There is something about I wrote in the talk page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Srebrenica_massacre#removed_from_the_article_because_it_is_not_in_ICTY_judgment

I think that you are neutral in this issue and that some other people will agree with me, so you might consider to put data chronological. --Oldadamml 13:43, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

At first sight, I agree that it is best to put the events in chronological order. Of course, if that means to shift various parts of the text around, than the text might need to be adapted. May I remind you to please include references stating where exactly you have copied the text from (if you did indeed copy them from the ICTY website)? -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:07, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eon8

Hi, thanks for your message on my talk page. Unfortunately I haven't deleted the article Eon8. It has been deleted six times in the last month or so, but never by me. Gwernol 23:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]