Talk:Names of the American Civil War
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Names of the American Civil War article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
Daily page views
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
So no one has called it the U.S. civil war?!
[edit]No one within the U.S. ever though to call this horrendous war the "Civil War of the United States" or variation of it. I find that hard to believe and wish I had sources that demonstrated at least a similar name to it. The closes to me it seems is the “War Between the States” as that was what it ended up being after the so called “Union” won, because the CSA was never recognized as a sovereign country, making the States seceding still part of the U.S. in the world-view, and the other names that point out the geographic locations of (at least most of) the belligerents, to me this is just taking sides as to who was attacking who in the other’s view. This comment is not to be taken as if I want the article’s name to be changed, is just that I have never heard this war being called this specifically and if it has been used I would like it to be added to this article. -- sion8 (talk) 5:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- You might want to review the "Civil War" section of the article one more time. Between the general U.S.-centric mind-set of many Americans, and the long-lasting toll of the horrendous conflict on the American psyche, the locational qualifier is not generally needed. Fat&Happy (talk) 06:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- In my haste I miss this, thank you for correcting my error. -- sion8 (talk) 2:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- Of course a locational qualifier isn't needed for Americans, everyone refers to their own civil war as 'the civil war'. 2A00:23A8:4C05:DB00:F8A4:146C:7A32:354 (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- It IS referred to as the "American Civil War", though, which is in keeping with the standard English convention of how to refer to civil wars (e.g., English Civil War, Spanish Civil War, Russian Civil War etc). In English the demonym for a person from the US is "American", because that was the label chosen by the founders of the US; prior to that, "American" exclusively meant American Indians, so adopting that label for themselves by people who had previously been called "English" was done in the spirit of wildness. But I've gone off on a tangent... Firejuggler86 (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Foreign languages
[edit]- One might distinguish [a civil war where rival forces seek to gain control of an entire state] from [a war of secession]. If the secessionists are victorious then the war will be called a war of independence; otherwise it may be called a rebellion. It is interesting to me that more [foreign-language wikipedia articles] are called "War of Secession" than "American War of Secession"; I don't know whether this is because other wars of secession are described using some other term than "war of secession" or because the American example is so pre-emininent.
- I note also Icelandic Wikipedia has w:is:Þrælastríðið "Slave War", though that has only 39~48 google hits.
jnestorius(talk) 10:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Slaveholder's Rebellion
[edit]A name used during and briefly after the war was the Slaveholder's Rebellion.
Frederick Douglas referred to it as such in speech: Frederick Douglass. “The Slaveholders’ Rebellion”. Speech, July 04, 1862. From Teaching American History. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/the-slaveholders-rebellion/ (accessed December 7, 2021).
Kansas senator Pomeroy introduced "A bill for the Suppression of the Slaveholder's Rebellion" in 1861.
Some informal discussion on its usage: https://civilwartalk.com/threads/war-of-northern-agression-v-slaveholders-rebellion-only-one-is-historically-correct.152621/
"Abraham Lincoln and most northerners initially referred to a civil war or an insurrection but quickly adopted "Rebellion," which stressed the goal of preserving the Union and stigmatized secession. Frederick Douglass and others proposed "Abolition war" or the "Slaveholders' Rebellion," but few northerners adopted them." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.51.198 (talk) 05:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Most non-yankee groups opposed the civil war veracity
[edit]> Since the free states and most non-Yankee groups (Germans, Dutch-Americans, New York Irish and southern-leaning settlers in Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois) showed opposition to waging the Civil War
Is this true. My understanding is that German-Americans tended to be anti-slavery and pro Civil War. Also yankee is a vague term. Do they mean New Englanders? Or Anglos? Earlsofsandwich (talk) 18:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class American Civil War articles
- American Civil War task force articles