Talk:Royal Astronomical Society

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Astronomical Society article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Astronomy: Solar System Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Royal Astronomical Society is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Content expansion

Well done, Rob! I've made a few changes to round out the entry a little further and to reflect the work of the RAS in the geophysical sciences. I've removed a slight inaccuracy in the previous version -- the Society's rules for award of medals are rather more complicated than "one medal for astronomy; one medal for geophysics", as implied there, but it certainly isn't worth going into the arcane details in a Wikipedia entry! It might be worth mentioning one or two of the geophysical eminences who have received the Gold Medal (Harold Jeffreys, for sure; Sidney Chapman must surely have received one, too). I'll come back to that later.

I've also inserted entries for one or two of the stubs that this edit has developed.

Russ Evans 26/12/03

Patrick Moore as President?

I rather doubt this. It's not mentioned in his Who's Who (UK) entry. --Runcorn 19:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Establishment category?

The RAS is currently in the category '1831 establishments'. Should it be in '1820 establishments' instead? --Robminchin 00:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Astronomical Society of London is 1820. The Royal charter was in 1831. People looking in the 1820 category might expect to find the RAS. People looking in the 1831 category might also expect to find it. I think categorising the redirect will do. Carcharoth 17:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection from "Astronomical Society"

At the moment, "Astronomical Society" redirects here. This could cause some confusion, and the hatnote is an attempt to alert readers to it. I just reverted a change by Modest Genius, who had changed the hatnote to refer only to the societies whose names resemble "Royal Astronomical Society". I would be in favour of putting that change back in if the redirection from "Astronomical Society" was removed, or changed to a disambiguation page, or even redirected to the List of Astronomical Societies. Or is there some particular reason why it should redirect to this article in particular? --Gronk Oz (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't realised that Astronomical Society redirected here. That seems rather odd - surely it should go directly to List of Astronomical Societies? 150 years ago the phrase 'the astronomical society' probably really did refer to the RAS, but today there are dozens of astronomical societies. Maybe bring it up at WP:AST or WP:RFD. For the moment I've tweaked the hatnote to avoid singling out any one particular society - we can reassess if/when the redirect changes. Modest Genius ^talk 09:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As almost all of the links to Astronomical Society have been changed, I fixed the last few and redirected it to the list. Modest Genius ^talk 17:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment - 2007

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Royal Astronomical Society/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have now added quite a lot of information to this article, but I wouldn't claim that it does not need work. Perhaps a long standing member could be persuaded to join our cause and help with the writing of this article. ought to turn out interesting, after all, it's astronomy! :-> Pulsar 22:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Could mention The Astronomical Register

It covered the London meetings of the RAS ~1878 and also correspondence from Fellows of RAS. eg The Astronomical Register ~1878 often mentions "Royal Astronomical Society" and has a record of meetings and correspondence & subscribing members. Mentioned for the redirect. Seems to be an independent publication by Jackson about RAS meetings rather than by the RAS. - Rod57 (talk) 21:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The 'publications' section deliberately only covers the RAS's own publications, not reports about the RAS appearing elsewhere. Lots of places have reported on RAS meetings, including some very obscure periodicals in the nineteenth century. The 'meetings' section mentions The Observatory, which carries the current formal minutes of Ordinary Meetings, but I don't think we need to list everywhere that ever reported on one. Modest Genius ^talk 16:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]