Jump to content

Talk:Mira Loma, California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Why does Loma-Prieta link here if you do a search? I just redirected it to Loma Prieta, and it still links here from the search page. -Aion 18:14 5 Jul 2003 (UTC)

why is there no information about the csd that serves mira loma

[edit]

the community service district is jurupa, it currently serves pedly, mira loma, glen avon, and eastvale. - signed by anon IP

The new city of Jurupa Valley encompassed Pedley, Rubidoux and Mira Loma, which all had competitive city incorporation plans in the 1990s. But (mostly) unincorporated county areas does not want to be annexed by other cities to avoid paying city services taxes. 71.102.26.168 (talk) 09:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

mira loma is now part of jurupa city

[edit]

the residents voted to be city yesterday75.24.247.231 (talk) 00:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was a lack of mention of Mira Loma was the site of a NASA installation, which opened in the early 1960's and closed in 1990, now the former base is a federally funded Superfund toxic removal site. Nearby Glen Avon has an infamous history being one of California's most polluted communities of water pollution from past chemical dumping (closed in the 1980's) first reported in the 1970s. The "town center" of Jurupa Valley is Pedley in terms of population and a higher average household income, and the "downtown" of the newly incorporated city: Rubidoux, an older community, known for providing schools, shopping, medical and commercial needs. 71.102.26.168 (talk) 09:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The USPS still uses the name Mira Loma. When I search for city name for 91752, USPS says that the recommended city name is Mira Loma. Sam Tomato (talk) 14:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mira Loma, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]