Talk:Shau Kei Wan
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Any suggestions for the subtitle if moving the part 'a word about transportation' to 'transportation'? It seems not to be a good subtitle under the title. 19KarWaiLee 16:04, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
About tranferation of paragraph
[edit]The topic of " A word about transportation " is not so suit. Actually, the headline can't reflect the body of paragraph.
The structure of the page is based on 1.history, 2.sights, 3.transportation, 4.environment, etc. The " A word about transportation " talks about the transportation situation in the old days. I am not too agree to move the paragraph to the subtitle " transportation", because that subtitle discusses about the present situation.
I suggest to change the title to " transportation in the past", I think it is more concrete to let reader know.
- Check the changes made. thanks 19KarWaiLee 03:18, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Transportation
[edit]suggest to use subtitles to separate different kind of transportation system 19KarWaiLee 03:21, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
About "transportation"
[edit]Totally agree with you. Actually, some of the morden transportation system have not mention yet and some such as tram, need to mention more. I think it is more interesting and valueable.
Transportation
[edit]Let's add some current transportation into it. Then we can have a transportation part and under that past we can have one part for the past and one part for now. How do you think about it?
Transportation
[edit]Let's add some current transportation into it. Then we can have a transportation part and under that past we can have one part for the past and one part for now. How do you think about it?
Be careful!!!
[edit]Hey groupmates, be careful of our linking of information, such as "Tam Kung", "Hong Kong Museum of Coastal Defence", "Yuk Wong", "Yiu Tung Shopping Centre", "Oi Tung Shopping Centre", "Hing Tung Shopping Centre"........
If the information is not enough or not valueable, be careful not to link the issue as a new page, just the the above exmaples, because the "Tam Kung" is not under voting of deletion by others, due to not enough information or may be a bit not valueable.
Lucky, no any other user agree except the proposer. If you have time, please go to Tam Kung know more about it.
16ronaldlai
Transportation
[edit]adding some current transportations is a good idea because both traditional and modern transportations method have strong relationship with the changes and developments of Shau Kei Wan.
Be careful also.
[edit]18wongngai posted a picture of "Museum of Coastal Defence". Be careful not to violate the copyright policy of wikipedia. Have you got the picture licence of that photo, or the photo was taken by yourself?
We can go to Wikipedia:Copyrights to read more about the details.
I took the photos myself, so don't worry about the copy right. I have changed the size of the photos to suit our page, but it needs sometime for the file to be updated. I will fix the problem if it cannot be resized tomorror.
Public Facilities
[edit]Should we include the Judo club under Public Facility? I don't think it is a kind of Public Facilities.
16ronaldlai: i think so! It is not so valuable issue, it is just a private club located at Shau Kei Wan.
It's time to tidy up the information.
[edit]Actually, we have a lot of information is in our article now, but i think some of them are not in the right place, and some of them are not appropriate for our topic. I think it's time for us to tidy up them.
Such as, i think the link "soho xx" need to check if it is in Shau Kei Wan. and i don't think the school, shopping mall, office are sight.
So, I suggest to added one more handing " community"
- I also doubt the location of soho as well. In the linked site it is stated that soho is in Sai Wan Ho 19KarWaiLee 04:39, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Schools
[edit]I've found that the name of a primary school is not matching that on the map. I have changed that from Shau Kei Wan Government Primary School to Shau Kei Wan Government School. Please correct it if it is wrong. I've also added two primary schools in the examples. There's more but I think adding too much is not good. 19KarWaiLee 04:28, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Library
[edit]we should add the Yiu Tung Public Library to the category Public Facilities as well, as I think it is quite an important and useful facilities in Shau Kei Wan.
Library
[edit]we should add the Yiu Tung Public Library to the category Public Facilities as well, as I think it is quite an important and useful facilities in Shau Kei Wan.
Residential housing
[edit]there are so many information in the page, but i think something important is missing from our information. We should mention the new/old, private/public housing estate in Shau Kei Wan as well. For examples, Yiu Tung Estate, Felicity Garden ......
Images
[edit]Hey, that article looks really good! But could you please indicate on the image description pages what the copyright of these images is? For pictures you took yourself, you might add the following:
Picture taken by the uploader, released under the GFDL. {{msg:GFDL}}
For the two first pictures, which seem to be copyrighted, you should indicate precisely what their copyright is, and why you think they can be used in Wikipedia. See Copyright for more info.
Lupo 10:12, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)