User talk:Sharkford
[Meelar's welcome boilerplate deleted]
America
[edit]Thanks for the note you left on my talk page. I agree that including that wording was "not inappropriate", but unfortunately it seems there's 300 million of them and only a few of us. My remarks about the register of language in which it is used were pretty much finessed, too. Oh, well: there are other, more important things to be done. –Hajor 18:18, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Mrs. Jordan
[edit]Sharkford,
Thank you for the information about Mrs. Jordan; I had presumed that "Mrs" meant there was a mister. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 16:29, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
Emigration question thanks
[edit]Thanks for answering my question on the ref desk. Sorry if I seemed a bit defensive. --I. Neschek 20:09, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Smokey and the Keystone Cops
[edit]Salve, Sharkford!
Thanks so much for your answers on WP:RD re the Pennsylvania Department of Ag and Smokey and the Bandit. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 18:18, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
Flag templates
[edit]Discussion moved from Wikipedia:Village_pump_(news)#Flag_templates to Template talk:Flag. USA (SEWilco 19:05, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC))
Maybe Katie
[edit]Salve, Sharkford!
We haven't communicated in a while and I hope this message find you well. Lately I've not fared well with my FAC nominees, some failing to win even one support vote. I wonder if you would look at Katie Holmes and its nominationhere and offer your comments. PedanticallySpeaking 15:51, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
Fathers
[edit]Thanks for your answer at WP:RD about fathers on birth certificates. I am grateful. PedanticallySpeaking July 8, 2005 20:50 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jonathan Pater
[edit]Jonathan Pater, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Jonathan Pater satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Pater and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Jonathan Pater during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ^demon[omg plz] 23:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 23:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- ??? I've had nothing to do with that article...how did this end up here? Sharkford 17:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Pre-Meiji coinage in Japan
[edit]I'm contacting you because of your record of contributions in the edit history of Japanese yen.
An exchange of views at Talk:Japanese yen/Archives/2012#Etymology is developing. Attention is focused on two sentences only:
- En literally means "round object" in Japanese, as yuan does in Chinese, referring to the ancient Chinese coins that were circular in shape and widely used in Japan up to the Tokugawa Period. In 1695, the character 元 (ghen), signifying "round or rounded") was placed on the obverse of copper coins.
- The reference source for this fact is:
- Titsingh, Isaac, ed. (1834). [Siyun-sai Rin-siyo/Hayashi Gahō (1652)], Nipon o daï itsi ran; ou, Annales des empereurs du Japon, tr. par M. Isaac Titsingh avec l'aide de plusieurs interprètes attachés au comptoir hollandais de Nangasaki; ouvrage re., complété et cor. sur l'original japonais-chinois, accompagné de notes et précédé d'un Aperçu d'histoire mythologique du Japon, par M. J. Klaproth. Paris: Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland.--Two copies of this rare book have now been made available online: (1) from the library of the University of Michigan, digitized January 30, 2007; and (2) from the library of Stanford University, digitized June 23, 2006. Click this link for digitized copy of page 415 from rare book in the collection of the University of Michigan
- The reference source for this fact is:
As I understand it, other editors are incredulous, suggesting that this data is likely to be spurious because confirmation is not readily found in conventional numismatic reference books which concern themselves with coins in general circulation during the Edo period Tokugawa shogunate in Japan.
- See corollary thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Pre-Meiji coinage in Japan
- See corollary thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics#Pre-Meiji coinage in Japan
I just wondered whether you might have a helpful contributions to make. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Min Chen
[edit]Perhaps there could be a disambiguation of sorts - Make "Min Chen (musician)" and turn Min Chen into a disambiguation page. Perhaps Chen Min could become a redirect to a disambiguation page as well. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Sharkford. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Sharkford. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Sharkford. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Sharkford. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)