User talk:Jwikip

Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit.
Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!
Jeff 09:11, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Image copyright tag missing

Hello, we're working hard to add image copyright tags to every image so that the copyright status is not ambiguous. I'd appreciate it if you could add the appropriate copyright tag to these images:

Image:Imgp0379-w200.jpg

Since you took the photo, you can release it under the GNU Free Document License by adding this information to the image description:

{{msg:GFDL}}

Jeff 09:11, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:ACORN random numbers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:ACORN random numbers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DannyS712 (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly changed the name of the talk page instead of the page itself and that (I think) is why they decided to delete it. A pity ! following my request, this deletion was reverted, and then tha page was deleted again - I decided not to insist. jw (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Restored

I restored Talk:ACORN random numbers per your request. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:29, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a moderated mass update script with flag 'Y' , to correct language errors ?

looking for a script that will allow me to do a mass update but after reviewing each affected page. I don't have the time to go thru the proper verify, edit, preview, check, publish, but am willing to help if such a script exists.

The error is "went onto"+verb , which occured 1237 time a short while back, which ought usually to be "went on to" + verb . Most, but beware not all, should be changed: eg. "he went onto free horses" would depend on the exact context to interpet its meaning [sorry it's a rather contrived example]

jw (talk) 20:45, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

I use JWB for this purpose and make some custom regular expression substitutions. I'm not sure what sort of flag you are looking for, but JWB does not have a bot flag set for it, if that's what you mean. Though I don't think that really matters for this sort of task. -- Beland (talk) 22:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Not a bot-flag but 'flag' would be for the human editor, after reviewing the context in each relevant page, to indicate Y (before the script updates that page)... too dangerous to mass update when there might probably be a small number of false positives. ... so looking for a sort of "moderated mass update" jw (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JWB lets you review the changes one page at a time, and then makes the changes you've approved for that page immediately. However, all the changes are made for you, you only see the part of the page where changes have been made, and it's a single button press to approve or skip. You do have an opportunity to make manual changes as well. -- Beland (talk) 15:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to use JWB but suspect that I need to be added to the list of approved users Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage.

@Beland: Can you approve me? I undertake to only use it for this one operation i.e. to fix went onto (at least until I find something else to fix :) ). In addition, I undertake to refer to you if/when I wish to do that.
@Beland: If you consider I don't have enough experience or that I am not sufficiently trustworthy for some other reason, then how can we find a trusty volunteer to do the task on our behalf? jw (talk) 20:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Ornithological Society moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oxford Ornithological Society, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. creffett (talk) 23:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Oxford Ornithological Society concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Oxford Ornithological Society, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Oxford Ornithological Society concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Oxford Ornithological Society, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oxford Ornithological Society

Hello, Jwikip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oxford Ornithological Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dhobi ghat

Thanks for you work on Dhobi ghat: I hope you like the result. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.) Blah2 (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]