Talk:List of Latin names of countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Shouldn't "Britannica" be "Britannia"? "Britannica" is an adjective, cf "Encyclopaedia Britannica" --Jeff Anonymous 22:20, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---

The title that seems more appropriate is the already-existing "Roman province." Wouldn't it make more sense to compile a complete list of Roman provinces, spelled correctly and divided among senatorial provinces and imperial one, under the various reassignments? That could be both historical and useful.

Or is this incomplete and redundant entry actually just a front for the Trojan horse entry of a "Thrace" province equated here with "Bulgaria?" User:Wetman

Ugh. Okay, so was Asia (presently the western chunk of Asia Minor or Turkey) a province, a Prefecture, a Diocese -- or just precisely what? The reason for my outburst is that I'm getting grumpy about all of these references to this small chunk of Asia Minor/Turkey getting mixed up with an article about the largest continent on Earth. And it would be nice to be able to link to something not quite as misleading. -- llywrch 01:36, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)

The page now says:

Belgica Belgium

Belgium The Netherlands

This isn't just a prank, is it? Just to make sure.

Also,

Bohemia Czechia and Slovakia

I thought it was just Czechia? --Shallot 16:24, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Reasons for the move

I've moved this article from Roman place names to Latin names of European countries because:

nobody really knew what it was supposed to be about (Roman provinces, Latin place names or what?), and
therefore was a total mess (included both former Roman provinces and places which were never part of the Roman Empire).

It still needs a lot of cleanup.
--Kpalion 23:42, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Ruthenia

Perhaps Ruthenia also belongs here? — Monedula 14:44, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Europe?

Tunisia and Egypt are Europe? -Branddobbe 07:06, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)

Iberia

According to the article about Hispania, Iberia is the greek name for Hispania. So, I'm going to remove it from the list, I hope that's okay?

Albion

As far as I was aware, Roman sources used the name Albion in reference to all of Great Britain, not just England. England in Latin is Anglia.

Caledonia did not encompass all of Scotland either. The southern uplands and a good portion of the central belt were not part of the wild north. Perhaps Caledonia should be qualified as only the northern parts of Scotland...--82.41.97.8 01:27, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And now signed in --Breadandcheese 01:28, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Defining purpose of this article

It seems a bit schizophrenic at the moment. Is the article intended to be a list of country names know to the Roman world, as most of it appears to be, or an exercise in latinisation of all countries today?

Bangladesh, Australia, New Zealand kind of leap out of the list as incongruous, unless the intention is to latinise the world. There are also a few regions in there which may have counted as countries in Roman times, but not today (Cornwall, eg.) and there are duplicate entries from different political perspectives (Israel, Palestine manages to achieve two entries).

May be useful to agree on what the article should primarily be attempting to achieve, and cleanup accordingly. Best regards Haruth (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

This article contains duplicates of "Dalmatia" as well as "Phoenicia/Foenicia" 108.59.79.158 (talk) 23:19, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Japan

Japan was known by Romans? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.13.98 (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New/Renaissance Latin

Add names for New/Renaissance Latin names by scholars? 162.157.81.204 (talk) 04:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should we rename this list to "List of Latin region names"?

Many of the names in this list are not for current countries, and often overlap multiple modern countries. "Region" is much more general and fits well. Prad Nelluru (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Celia

I'm no expert but I'm fairly sure the Roman Empire never made it as far as New Zealand 208.83.229.89 (talk) 06:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]