Category talk:Sexual urban legends

Untitled

I would suggest all three of these phenomena be combined into one article and they all redirect to that article. Perhaps Sexual urban legends should be created and this category deleted.

I'm going to suggest something different: progesterex, penis captivus and vagina dentata are true urban legends that meet the UL criteria, and are notable enough for an article, in the same way as other well-known ULs. The others (donkey punch, Cleveland steamer etc.) are just apocryphal sexual practices that exist only as dirty jokes, and should all be merged into a single article that might actually be notable. We should be able to do all of this without needing afd (since nothing will be deleted, only merged and trimmed), and hopefully without feeding the "anti-censorship" trolls (ditto). -- The Anome 17:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think the creator of this Category understood what an "Urban Legend" is. That, or someone else who doesn't understand the phrase Urban Legend keeps adding random sexual practices to the category. Do we really need it? Oddity- (talk) 05:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia category

Just noting that i removed this template, cos i think it was the wrong one. The description does not match the content: "This category is used for administration of the Wikipedia project, and is not part of the encyclopedia. It contains pages which are not articles, or groups articles by status, rather than content." This is for categories such as article status (GA/FA) or "needs n infobox". Is there a template for categories that do contain articles as part of the encylopedia, or is that assumed if no template?Yobmod (talk) 07:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]