Jump to content

Talk:Project Pitchfork

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

As per discussion on Talk:Assemblage 23 and Category talk:Goth, removing from Category:Goth and adding to List of non-goth musical artists popular within goth subculture. - Korpios 02:08, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)


cat

[edit]

Pitchfork is not an EBM project, in germany it was called "electro wave" in the early 90's, and now it's modern elektro/rock. Not every kind of electronic music is electronic body music. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.122.32.94 (talkcontribs)

Err? Pitchfork is way too active to be synthpop/darkwave. Too much baseline, way way too much baseline. Just because EBM got overused doesnt mean its not applicable sometimes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.204.105 (talkcontribs)
They were darkwave/electrowave until the middle of the 1990s. "IO" is the last electronic wave album of Project Pitchfork. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Menorrhea (talkcontribs)

Not to be confused with...

[edit]

Perhaps it would be worth saying that these should not be confused with the other names on the darkwave scene that are 'Pro-jekt' and 'Projekt Records' that are both unrelated? J Milburn 21:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This has been done already by now :o) --Bisco (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiformat

[edit]

All the songs/album titles need to be wikiformated, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Format. --Bisco (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Project Pitchfork. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits for tense?

[edit]

Is it appropriate to make edits to this article for present tense/past tense correction? Send with standard English usage of date format

I’m guessing it was converted into English. I’m not a frequent wiki user. Mikebellman (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Project Pitchfork. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]