Talk:Hydra 70

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

The page contains a number of uses of the word "fuzes". Shouldn't it be "fuses"? Maybe the English dialect of whoever entered the text allows the former spelling, but since the topic is US-related, shouldn't the US spelling apply? I reali(z/s)e that as a Canadian, it is possible that the spelling with the "z" is correct but I doubt it.

"Fuse" is not spelt as "Fuze" in any English dialect I know of. --80.229.225.137 18:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is spelled "fuze" in American English. See here http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fuze -- Thatguy96 19:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That site is american of course, but!: 'fuze' is distinct in that it refers to an explosive triggering device, not an electrical component. I doubt different spellings are relevant here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.134.243 (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found this as well... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuse_%28explosives%29#Fuze Up to you to decide the correct/relevant spelling now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.134.243 (talk) 16:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

The picture at the top of the article is an AH-1G which fired Mk40 2.75-inch FFAR rockets from the M200 19-shot rocket pod or launcher (2 shown). --Born2flie 19:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It also says "missiles," a better picture should be located. -- Thatguy96 20:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did they?

Did they make a nuclear version of this rocket so that if anyone tries to attack a platform that has these rockets, they will be sorry? Mickman1234 (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. These rockets are too small for a nuclear warhead.Righteous9000 (talk) 06:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sky blue rockets are inert dummies

Sky blue aircraft rockets--be they Hydra 70s, Sidewinders or whatever--are inert dummies used only as mass simulators for training. This article needs to be illustrated with some close-up photos of real Hydra 70 rockets with live engines and fuses. Some Hydra 70 warheads are turquoise blue but can be easily distinguished from dummies by the presence of the fuse on the forward tip of the nose. The blue rockets in the first photo in this article are clearly labeled as dummies. The third photo also shows dummies. Keep looking. Good photos of real Hydra 70s are easy to find online. Magneticlifeform (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.army-technology.com/projects/hydra-70-rocket-system-us/
Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing information

"10 M442 Air burst, Motor-Burnout Delay Discharges Flare at 3,281 yards (3,000 m), 17-22G required for arming"

What are these 17-22G? Are they a certain type of fuses or does "G" means some kind of acceleration, as in g-force? --37.24.9.229 (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

K, found it is g-force so it schould be put like 17 - 22 g and not with a capital "G". --37.24.9.229 (talk) 14:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The map of countries that utilize the Hydra 70 highlights Columbia, but it's not included in the bulleted list. Depending on which source is accurate (the graphic or the list), the other should be brought into alignment.

CRV-7 2.75" rocket

The article states that the Hydra rocket is derived from the American FFAR rocket. I would suggest a look at the CRV-7 rocket, an earlier rocket, developed by Canada. Teknodweeb (talk) 13:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations

I don't understand the politics here. I provided my own illustrations. But I am not allowed to publish them on the page because they are created by me or I have to give up copyright entirely. AkelaFreedom (talk) 10:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not policy, but copyright law. You cannot post copyrighted images to Wikimedia Commons without clear permission from the copyright holder. BilCat (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the copyright holder AkelaFreedom (talk) 11:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, my images are not registered on any copyright sites. AkelaFreedom (talk) 11:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The DeviantArt site lists a copyright in your name for 2018-2022 on the image page. That's all that's needed. BilCat (talk) 11:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a specialist in jurisprudence, can you specifically explain what to do according to your rules - I am the author of these works and I want to provide them free of charge for publication in this article, what else is required of me? AkelaFreedom (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Production Contractors

So, looking at an old Tom Clancy book; "Armored Cav", he lists in the Bibliography the the contractor is BEI Defense Systems. There isn't a wiki page for that, but I did find a fascinating source on the companies history:

{edit} the link was blocked for some reason, it was from "reference for business BEI-Technologies-Inc"

It was a former Piano/Organ Company (D.H.Baldwin), in WW2 it's woodworking abilities were used for aircraft manufacture. But post-war, it switched from Wood focus to Electronic focus in Next-Generation Musical Instruments. In the early 50's, this earned it the attention of the Military, then NASA (1963 Baldwin Electronics Inc.). It's unclear when it became contractor for the Hydra-70, as it doesn't seem to have had prior involvement in explosives or rocket engines.

By 1997, it seems to have shut down it's munitions manufacture, it's remaining Products being Sensors & Medical Technology. (As an aside, banking was a major part of it's early history as a piano maker/seller, the banking side was split in 1974, unclear what became of the instrument part of the company)

So I don't know who restarted rocket production after BEI left.

Thought this would be interesting!2603:7080:CB3F:5032:F195:44E2:9B42:EBDB (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since 1996, it seems that General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems was the Prime Contractor

Another source says it was "Lockheed Martin Ordnance Systems", that was then sold to General Dynamics in 1999 named "Armament and Technical Products" at the time?2603:7080:CB3F:5032:F195:44E2:9B42:EBDB (talk) 22:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History?

When were they created? What conflicts have they seen service in? All the article says is "The Hydra 70 is derived from the 2.75-inch (70 mm) diameter Mk 4/Mk 40 Folding-Fin Aerial Rocket developed by the United States Navy for use as a free-flight aerial rocket in the late 1940s. The Mk 40 was used during the Korean and Vietnam wars". Okay, so that's when the FFAR was developed and used - when was the Hydra 70? 110.145.146.198 (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]