User talk:Coyotez

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I find useful

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Cheers, Sam [Spade] 20:31, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Petaluma Geneology

Saw your comment in the Petaluma page. I would like to view some of the Petaluma greats.... CodeCarpenter 21:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon

Thanks for adding all that good stuff to the article--do you have any sources for the info? Let me know if you need help with citations. Katr67 20:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to read this, the latest population figures from the official state source. The Salem MSA has been bigger than Eugene/Springfield since at least 2000. Also, please be sure to provide citations from [WP:RS|reliable sources]], that way your additions will not be deleted as original research. Aboutmovies 06:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, got it. But I would rather use the US Census Bureau site http://www.census.gov/, which is probably a better cite. Coyotez

Use either one, but do use one. Since what you wrote in the article: "In late 2006 Salem-Keizer metro area bypassed Eugene-Springfield metro area population to become the second largest city in Oregon." is not only unsourced, but incorrect using either the US Census estimates you prefer or the official state estimates put out by the PRC. Both show Salem as being the larger MSA since at least 2000. Aboutmovies 23:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Salem are introducing unnecessary detail and are for the most part unsourced. I've reverted your changes because I didn't want to hunt for all the spelling errors you introduced. Please discuss any changes you want to make on the article's talk page. Thanks. Katr67 20:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capitol/capital

I'm not sure why you insist on getting this backwards to the point of breaking templates. Capital is the city, capitol is the building. Let me know if you need me to give you links to grammar websites if you don't believe me. Katr67 20:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think the editors here are alert enough to have fixed this by now if it was wrong? Please refer to http://wsu.edu/~brians/errors/capital.html and let me know if you need more proof. Katr67 20:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK my bad, don't beat me up about it. Jeez! Coyotez 20:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you seem to have missed my post about this earlier and I just wanted you to stop changing the words to their opposites. Sorry if you feel beat up, that wasn't my intention. Just make sure of your facts next time. Katr67 20:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coyote

Are you the same Coyote from Oregon that I know from another site? If not, ignore me. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 03:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abel Douglass

The article Abel Douglass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apart from apparently being a pretty good whaler, there isn't anything that is "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded", the plain English version of notability.

Also, everything since 2007 seems to have been maintenance updates. Nobody seems to care enough even to write a decent first sentence.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ospalh (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abel Douglass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abel Douglass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abel Douglass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ospalh (talk) 21:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abel Douglass, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages American Hotel and James Dawson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page Blanking

I've reverted your blanking of the Abel Douglass article. Blanking an article (removing all content) is not how an article is deleted. If you'd like to know more about how Wikipedia deletes articles, you may wish to visit Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Good luck, Stesmo (talk) 20:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]