What appears to be a very non-notable cookbook. Or should I have an article for every individual O'Reilly "In a Nutshell" publication? --Robert Merkel 09:24, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete, if we had an article for every cookbook ever published by a magazine publisher, we'd have.. well, too many from my kitchen alone! —Stormie 11:53, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC)
Real book. Keep unless someone can show evidence that Reiman Publications LLC is a vanity press operation. Wikipedia is not paper. Rossami 15:23, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable. Vanity pages are about real people, but people have to be notable to be included. In the same vein, articles on books should be about notable books (imagine what would happen if every book got an article). Minimum standards of inclusion must apply. Wikipedia is not paper - Servers are not cheap. SWAdair | Talk 04:41, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. It is a real book and wikipedia should have as many articles as possible without including non-famous people. Servers are no cheap, no, but for $200 a month you can have a server than can hold 500,000 normal sized novels of data. If we need to donate more to wikipedia to let it expand I for one will donate. (anon user)
Delete - went back and forth but can't see it expanding as an article. Right now it has less than you'll find on any book site. - Tεxτurε 18:02, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
