Talk:List of historical regions of Central Europe
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Just out of curiosity: is Aukštaičiai the same as Polish Auksztota?Halibutt 20:45, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. --Kpalion 21:46, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
As mentioned elsewhere, this list/map omits places in the south such as Carinthia, Slavonia, Backa, ... Kpalion, is there a blank yellow map we can work with, or do I need to patch the image up manually? --Shallot 08:50, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
- OK, I made a blank map and I also extended it to the south a bit so that now there should be no problem with adding places -- which I think could be considered as part of both CE (historically) and the Balkan Peninsula (geographically) -- like Carniola, Carinthia, Vojvodina, Slavonia, Krajina, Pannonia, etc. --Kpalion 11:48, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
- The list should be reformatted by naming the regions exactly as they are officially called in English. Specifying all national names for each region (on the respective pages) would also be great. AlexPU 17:42, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- But the regions are listed under their English names.... Halibutt 08:30, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)
- what about Tyrol? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.47.237.55 (talk) 02:26, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
ALL regions in Europe are "historical" as all have a history. This is a fake term used mostly by the Poles to try and justify their invasions and occupations of other people's provinces and lands. Wikipedia admins should stop this falsification of history. 2A00:23C4:B63A:1800:5D10:9127:7E99:6038 (talk) 12:27, 14 October 2018 (UTC)