User talk:Melaen

for the older page see: archive1, archive2

Li Chaw Wet

You had tagged this as a suspected hoax, but I've started an AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Chaw Wet. Please join in if you are so inclined. ... discospinster _talk 00:43, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSD tag on Invention of electricity

I changed this CSD tag as it is not a Test page, but rather a hoax. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 00:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it doesn't have sources

As I said, I'm going to sleep. Are you a robot? I'm putting sources in when I wake up. This is in regards to Home prime.Julzes (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Chastnaya

Hello Melaen. I am just letting you know that I deleted Chastnaya, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:10, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Power Point Ranger

The article had been vandalised. See my comment at the AfD and check out the unvandalised version which I have restored. JohnCD (talk) 18:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perry Island

Please see Talk:Perry Island and Talk:Perry Island#Dab. Peter Horn User talk 21:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! Mike Restivo (talk) 05:17, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Upcoming iPhone 5 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Upcoming iPhone 5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upcoming iPhone 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 18:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Skool Prime Minister

Hi. Sorry, but I've taken your CSD A7 off because I can't see how it fits - it's a comic strip but hard copy and not on the web. I've got doubts about the notability, and am considering redirecting it to The Dandy. Quite a few of their strips/characters have their own article, but I'm not sure about this one. Peridon (talk) 12:40, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Constructivity Model Viewer

Hello Melaen, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Constructivity Model Viewer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note about Traveling with asmartphone as a guide

I agree with your PRODing of Traveling with asmartphone as a guide, but could you make the reason you give in the template more detailed in future, and preferably give wikilinks to the relevant guidelines? The article was written by a new contributor who presumably has no idea about the original research and not-a-guide rules, so they need to be given more information to understand what the problem is.--Physics is all gnomes (talk) 13:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Melaen! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Category:Benches

Category:Benches, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B'nai Jeshurun Congregation, Pepper Pike, OH

I have responded to your note about deleting the language in the B'nai Jeshurun Congregation, Pepper Pike, section. There is no copyright infringement, the language is directly from the synagogue website and as the executive director of the synagogue we have control over this wording and may use it where appropriate. Telling our story on Wikipedia through this history is beneficial. There is no copyright infringement here, this is an authorized use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.94.66.43 (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletion of Article - Oracle Flow Builder

Hi,

Can you be more specific in detail as what is the issue, I am very new to Wikipedia, I have been trynig to share knowledge to people about ORACLE FLOW BUILDER, the new product of ORACLE.

There is no much resources available outside in the internet which can give some insight of it, I felt it deserves to get a place in Wikipedia so that readers or learners will get a chance to read about it and learn about it.

It would be better to educate me how to write, rather mark for delete directly and make me fee shy in sharing any more knowledge through wikipedia.

an immediate response on this would be appreciated.

--Spotnuru (talk) 02:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MissBrooksphd

in regards to draft virtual scanning technology - page was deleted but I want to get access to edit it elsewhere if possible please

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bompiani, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Adelphi and James Cain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Bompiani page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i have removed the notability list.

I just wanted to write about my school. You can review my page back. If you think my page is fine then please let me know. And moreover please feel free to share new ideas regarding my page. Jyotishman12345 (talk) 14:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explicit links to dab pages

Hi and welcome back. Just leaving a quick note that intentional links to disambiguation pages don't normally get piped if they appear in "see also" sections or in hatnotes. This is to make it explicit to the reader that the link is to a dab page. This at least is what an RfC decided a few months ago. – Uanfala (talk) 00:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Melaen (talk) 00:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Medici: Masters of Florence (TV Show)

Right Honorable Melaen of Prior commitments. The Spotnitz TV series Medici: Masters of the Renaissance (starring Dustin Hoffman) has just previewed on Rai/1 (Italian TV) and there's no English language Wiki entry -- although it is mentioned in the Spotnitz post. Fb2ts (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Melaen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Melaen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Melaen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"The Final World War" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect The Final World War should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 21#The Final World War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Regards, SONIC678 18:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Participation in a research study of Wikipedians

Hi Melaen,

My name is Lara Yang, and I am a PhD student in Organizational Behavior at Stanford University. As a part of a research study to better understand work dynamics on Wikipedia, our research team is currently conducting interviews with Wikipedians. Because you are an active editor on Wikipedia, we would love to learn more about your work and hear your perspective on how Wikipedia, and open-source communities in general, function to produce and organize high-quality knowledge. We have done our best to learn about the dynamics of collaboration on Wikipedia from secondary sources, which we are hoping to complement with your invaluable first-hand insights. The interview will take around 45 minutes and be semi-structured in format. Any identifying information in your responses will be kept strictly confidential, and will not be disclosed in the analysis nor the research paper. If you are interested in participating, please email me at larayang@stanford.edu or via the Email this user tool on my user page and suggest a few time slots in the upcoming weeks that work best for you. We will do our best to accommodate your schedule. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to let us know. We look forward to hearing from you.

Best, Lara

Wanderingpotato (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Daily Campus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Daily Campus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Campus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chances last a finite time (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Umrani(khosa)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Umrani(khosa) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 21 § Umrani(khosa) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Idiosyncrasy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idiosyncrasy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiosyncrasy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 04:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]