User talk:La hapalo

Word Up! La hapalo 07:17, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way! I like your work on Chanel Cole - a very nice article. I wish we had ones as good on some of the other contestants. Ambi 12:36, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Welcome

I noticed your additions to the Kosmic article. Welcome to Wikipedia! :) —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:53, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Copy control

Autocategorising pages with the template is usefull. But why do they all appear under * instead of the right alphabet? Is this wanted behaviour?

Templates are not normally categorised, but the pages including a

template can be categorised separately, as you can read at...

Help:Template#A_category_tag_in_a_template.3B_caching_problem

So I'll remove the category from the template and add it to the

pages. The other questions are still open. --Easyas12c 18:53, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Should a template be created for Category:Musical performers with copy control releases too? It could look same as the album template, but have different text.

We should discus the default place for the template. So yours or mine? The album pages should look consistent.

I moved templates you had set to the album pages to mach layout of

the ones set by me. I don't want to claim that I'm right and everyone

should follow, but now they are consistent while this is discussed

further. --Easyas12c 19:10, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

My way the user can see, if he wants to continue reading. Your way it's more of a sidenote. I don't know which one is better. There can be even better place for the template then ours... Maybe we should have a vote at the album project?

--Easyas12c 08:44, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this discussion, so I've copied it to Template talk:copycontrol —La hapalo 13:10, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Copy control logo.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Copy control logo.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

I've replaced Image:Copy control logo.jpg with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg (on the right) because the PNG format is more suitable than JPEG for this image. This version is also larger and does not have JPEG artifacts. I hope you don't mind :) —jiy (talk) 10:34, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, that's great. I was going to get around to it myself, but your version looks better than any I could find. —La hapalo 14:06, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Copy control logo.png

Hello, La hapalo. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Copy control logo.png) was found at the following location: User talk:La hapalo. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Doch

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Doch, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Doch seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Doch, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Doch itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Regurgitator.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Regurgitator.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kaya2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kaya2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Full fathom five.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Full fathom five.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Machine_gun_fellatio_promo_shot.jpg

I have tagged Image:Machine_gun_fellatio_promo_shot.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:La hapalo/Chanel Cole backup

User:La hapalo/Chanel Cole backup, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:La hapalo/Chanel Cole backup and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:La hapalo/Chanel Cole backup during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]