Talk:Kalmia latifolia

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nomenclature

Are the varieties supposed to be species of Kalmia, which should probably go under just Kalmia rather than here, or subspecies of K. latifolia? In both cases the names should be lower-cased and italicized, but the "Var." should also be changed to "Sp." or "Ssp." as appropriate.

Also, would Mountain Laurels be considered Rhododendron? They are both in the heath or heather family (Ericaceae) Samatva (talk) 02:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They are not varieties or species, they are named cultivars, which are always capitalised (see MOS:LIFE). Kalmia and Rhododendron are different genera within Ericaceae. Darorcilmir (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Toxicity

I don't doubt that K. latifolia is toxic, but we need a solid source for that info, especially since this subsection goes into such specifics. I'll see what I can find, but in the meantime, any other help would be much appreciated. --Photosynthetic430 (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Refs added. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medical use

The information being added to the "Medical use" section appears to be taken almost word-for-word from this blog, including the misspelling of the word "mash". Since the entire section was unreferenced, and mountain laurel is a poison, I deleted the whole section (I was not the first, either[1]). If historic and/or scientific refs can be found that prove the plant is useful medically, please add them. The two "medical" refs I found said nothing had been proven (WebMD), and that people from the Delaware tribe used it to commit suicide (UPenn ref used in the article but without historical source, and repeated ad infinitum all over the net). 71.234.215.133 (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012: Toxicity

I removed Poisonous Plants of the Southern United States as it does not list any specific animals that K.l. is poisonous to. I therefore removed sheep, as it no longer had a reference.
I removed the speculation about the Smokey Mountains and rhododendron, as it was unsupported by the ref. While rhododendron is undoubtedly a source of grayanotoxin, this article is about K.l.. The ref also states, " In the eastern half of the United States grayanotoxin-contaminated honey may be derived from other members of the botanical family Ericaceae, to which rhododendrons belong. Mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) and sheep laurel (Kalmia angustifolia) are probably the most important sources of the toxin." Bad Bug Book - Grayanotoxin, section 6: Relative Frequency of Disease The eastern half of the United States contains the Smokey Mountains.
The description of K.l. versus rhododendron is not needed in this section, and probably not in the entire article, unless a reference as to the importance of distinguishing between the two plants can be found.
I removed A Modern Herbal as the section deals with toxicity, not historical medical uses. Also, it was not cited to the actual book or a scanned version thereof (volume? page number? publisher?).

Thundersnow 12:34, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Common names

Other sites talk about lambkill as being similar to mountain laurel, or mistaken for mountain laurel. Here it is one of the names for mountain laurel. Which is correct? I believe the distinction (or not) should be mentioned and described. Chasecf (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the top of the page is a link to disambiguating mountain laurel, a common name that is used for several plants. Perhaps that is the source of confusion, but you haven't pointed to these "other sites" so I can't try to understand them. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 18:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kalmia latifolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalmia latifolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090115181617/http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural_heritage/ncTIIIe.shtml to http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural_heritage/ncTIIIe.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalmia latifolia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924141306/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?21115 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?21115
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://plants.in.gov/java/profile?symbol=KALA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use by Native Americans

It seems dangerous to follow a section describing legal Toxicity with details of unscientific aboriginal herbal medicine uses. If such uses are efficacious, some citation should be given. If not, this should be clearly marked as unverified folklore and potentially dangerous use of the plant. 174.73.176.201 (talk) 20:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Origin

The article says that the plant is native to North America, but later that it was brought from Europe in the 18th century.

Brought TO Europe in the 18th century. Darorcilmir (talk) 10:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other sources all agree that it is native to the eastern USA. 87.6.65.205 (talk) 09:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]