User talk:Lord Bob/Archive1
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~
Dori 06:31, Nov 25, 2003 (UTC)
No problem with order of precedence...We really ought to update it, at least to the first of the year, which is a logical point, but it's rather a tremendous task... john 00:42, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)
War of 1812 and General Brock
[edit]Hey Lord Bob. Thanks for your Berton reference on the War of 1812 talk page -- I've also heard it as "a mere matter of marching" rather than "a matter of marching." I don't have a reliable reference to point to and can't even cite the source (a Jefferson letter, speech, article...?) but if I stumble on one, I'll post it.
Regarding your interest in General Brock and the battle of Queenston Heights: I attended Brock University in St. Catharines in the 1970s and have been mildly interested in both Sir Isaac and War of 1812 history ever since. So, I've kept something of an eye out for tv programs and websites on both subjects since.
You may find these two sites of interest; I've bookmarked them but not gone through them entirely.
I enjoyed watching the Galafilm documentary series, FWIW, and wouldn't hesitate to recommend it to anyone. Their upcoming companion CD-ROM also looks good.
Best wishes for your educational plans. And if you ever get down near Niagara Falls, do visit the Brock U. campus; in Pond Inlet, one of the quiet corners of the campus, they have a chunk of the original Brock sculpture from when the first Queenston Heights monument was blown up. So you can actually sit on Sir Isaac's shoulder. :)
Cheers,
- Patrick, Madmagic 22:59, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)
More 1812 etc.
[edit]I'm not likely to be doing much more on the War of 1812, but I have looked over most (I think...) of the major Wikipedia pages related to the Military history of Canada, and it would appear more filling in of major gaps -- and something of a reorganization of that page -- are both badly needed.
Currently the Military history of Canada page itself contains a lot less on WWI (two paragraphs and some points with a link or two) than on 1812; the WWII section was a single paragraph yesterday (!) and even doubling the number of words and links now there would barely outline the major issues.
A question: Is there a place on Wikipedia (outside of the Village Pump & newcomers VP) where one can recruit others to help out with a page re-organization? Or is that just something to post on the relevant Talk page, and then go at it, following existing examples, the FAQs and style guides?
Since working on the WWII section and Intrepid page yesterday/ last night, it's occurred to me that one first step might be to create a sub-page off my User:madmagic page, and start a simple list-of-links, within Military history of Canada and related pages.
This isn't menat to be a page for public use, so much as a reference guide and fast navigation aid -- for the process of researching and then for internal linking, whenever I'm filling in gaps or trying to figure out the most practical way of re-ordering existing articles.
I'll likely do some work on that tonight and over the next few days. Check my page if you're interested and/or you want to comment/contribute. And thanks for your kind comments. :)
Cheers,
-Patrick Madmagic 04:57, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lord Bob, I found you when I read your comment at the vote regarding Pro-American sentiment. Unfortunately no one has yet taken care of it. But there are more important things. I started a project about learning, mainly vocabulary. Some guys discussed it with me on my user page. Since you are in the period of life where learning has a special focus I hope you are interested. If so, please let me know there as well. By the way, I spent a year in Toronto, and I like Canada a lot. Get-back-world-respect 01:10, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Yeah, well, I know qbasic sucks. It is just that I cannot program well in anything else than basic. Can you? I want to learn something better, just cannot make up my mind if I should opt for Java - which I once tried and found more difficult than basic - C++ or python. Get-back-world-respect 01:25, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Malicious Deletion Attempt
[edit]Hello. Sorry for the imposition, but I thought you might be interested to note that an article you supported in the past on vfd has been listed again under malicious circumstances - the 3rd such attempt in 7 months. Please feel free to review the discussion and cast your vote as you feel appropriate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Atlantium --Gene_poole 10:33, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Could you have another look at Opposition to Castro? I'm not sure what it was like when you looked at it (I gather is started out very POV), but at this point it looks to me like the nucleus of a good article. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:17, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
Wikinews demo up and running
[edit]Hi!
I'm writing to let you know that the Wikimedia Board of Trustees has approved the first stage of the Wikinews project. There's now a fully operational English demo site at demo.wikinews.org. This will be used for experimenting with various review models and basic policies before the site is launched officially in about a week. demo.wikinews.org will become the English version later.
You voted for the Wikinews project, so I'm asking for your participation now. Everything is open, nothing is final. What Wikinews will and can be depends in large part on you. There already is a global Wikinews mailing list for discussing the project. If you are interested at all, please subscribe -- coordination is of key importance. There's also an IRC channel #wikinews on irc.freenode.net. Realtime discussion can help to polish up articles.
If you're looking for something to do, check out the articles in development and articles in review. Or start a new story in the Wikinews workspace, or ignore the proposed review system - it's up to you. I hope you'll join us soon in this exciting experiment.--Eloquence* 01:58, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
You voted to keep this article. Since your vote new comments have established that its speculative since such a periodic table is just a conjecture which is already treated on the anti-matter page. Would you mind either commenting on the comments (if you think they don't justify deletion) or changing your vote?? Mozzerati 15:33, 2004 Nov 20 (UTC)
Your deletion strategy
[edit]Seems to me, that you have a lot of deleting going on - I saw your name in Dickinson High School, and it offended me somehow. First - because you put a Lord in front of your name and second because you haven't returned and added comments to the changes of the page. Now - could it be, that it is because of the first problem, that you must see some notability around, before you care? Or is it simply because you are of anti-initiative nature and want the world to concentrate on 1812-like events?
Please give room for more things to be described - and learn to be positive. Wikipedia can contain a lot of things incl. as many High Schools as it takes. Don't you know, that a school gets a special place in the heart of a human being - a thing to be remembered and not deleted in your memory? Or did you have some bad experience, when you went to school - so that you don't want to be reminded?
In an open society - like that of a Wikipedia - I see no reason for not including everything, that a person want to put into it. If you don't care about it, just don't read it and go on with what you like in your life. It's OK to tell the contributor (that's me), that the article needs improvement - and luckily someone did - but do want it deleted just because there is no Lords or Dragons or Generals or whatever from a specific High School - that's beyond my imagination.
So ... my good Lord - a good and sound advice is to become positive in an ever changing world. And give a helping hand, if need be. --Hansjorn 06:23, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
Henry Proct_r
[edit]If you ever get around to doing an article about General Henry Proctor, please note that people spell his name both "Proctor" and "Procter". "Proctor" seems to be more widely used, but "Procter" seems to be preferred by more trustworthy sources. --Kevin Myers 05:13, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Hello! You don't know me, but I'm working on getting Isaac Brock as a feature article. It's in peer review right now. In any case, I've written a Henry Procter stub (it was a red link in Isaac Brock, and I couldn't have that), and I have Proctor as a redirect. If you have time, take a look at it. It's pretty bare bones.
- Best Wishes. --Scimitar 23:24, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Elizabeth II renaming (round XXXIV)
[edit]You may have noticed *mega sigh* that yet another user has dragged up the lets rename Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom farce, only 9 days after the last vote ended. (What next? A vote every day on the issue next?) I have proposed instead this vote on Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom page:
That Wikipedia stop wasting time on endless revoting on this goddamned issue and ban votes on this issue from this page for at least six months.
Hopefully this will put this nonsense to bed for at least 6 months. Your (hopefully final) vote would be welcome. FearÉIREANN
\(caint) 21:05, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Revert on Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/SimCentral
[edit]Sorry about that, I mainly saw something funny happen to one of my tags underneath to a scok/meat puppet and reverted it ([1]). I think I didn't visually process the addition of a comment too. An honest, if unfortunate, mistake. I have reverted my revert and repaired my tag manually. Thanks for alerting me (and for being nice about it). -Splash 07:18, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
On my way to class so I don't have time to deal with this properly, so I thought I'd alert you instead if you want to say anything. I suspect FatherSkeel of being a serial vandal also using sock puppets Hubris and Dogman1. --Dvyost 13:55, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
You know, I never would have guessed before I put this on my Watchlist that it would be such a target of random vandalism. Jkelly 02:30, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
Admin
[edit]I noticed on RfA your observation that you are a two-year veteran non-admin. If you ever want the mop, you can count on my strong support (and I'll happily nominate if you wish). I firmly believe we need more sane admins. Best wishes, Xoloz 22:02, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
My RFA
[edit]I want to thank you for voting in my RFA even though u opposed me I understand why. Thanks Again. And oh yeah even though you opposed me in mine I agree with Xoloz u should become a admin and I also could nominate you if you like --JAranda | watz sup 23:04, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Royal Canadian Navy pictures
[edit]Hi, I noticed you have added a few picture from the RCN website. I guess it is wikipedia's policy to no longer allow images that are only for non-commercial use. According to the copyright info page the RCN images are only available for non-commercial use. I was just wondering if you did have permission to put them on wikipedia. If not they will have to be deleted, sadly. --129.173.105.28 18:24, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- You are very likely correct about the Canadian naval images being delete-worthy. At the time I uploaded them, these policies did not apply, and I am quite upset that they apply now but that's an argument for another time. They're going to be pretty difficult, if not impossible, to replace with free images (although I live near Canada's Pacific naval base, so I might be able to track down, like, one). Still, I ain't running to a sysop telling them to speedy them all, let's just say. (reply mirrored from the anony's talk page, since you can never tell if an IP will get it if it's at their talk page) Lord Bob 18:40, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- I completely agree with you; I wish Wikipedia would allow not for profit material. I'm in no rush to tag existing images, I was hoping by some stroke of luck someone had received authority. --129.173.105.28 19:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
You
[edit]I wish to interview you, or atleast find out your life story, and some other things. I am trying to research all about humankind and all types of peoples. I have randomly chosen you, if you wish to comply to this, it can be done in secrecy through e-mail, or easily on the talk pages, which ever is easiest for you. But if you don't like this idea, then tell me on talk page. Private Butcher 01:11, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.
The final outcome was (96/2/0), so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any queries about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again, thanks!FireFox 18:50, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Bloggerhell
[edit]Well, it's happened. We ended up with the one absolutely unacceptable result: one of them got deleted (Blogging Tories) and the other one got kept (Progressive Bloggers). What would you propose that we do to resolve this, since it constitutes "bias by inclusion" to treat them differently from each other? Bearcat 19:15, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- Hi. I'd ask that you have a look at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Blogging_Tories#Summarised_arguments and see what you think of my contribution. While I agree that it's unfortunate that these articles weren't treated equally, that is the way that it work sometimes. I've also put some thoughts at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Progressive Bloggers that make me feel that this did fall acceptably in the range of "no consensus", although it was very close.
I'd hate to see what I believe was the correct (if poorly annotated) deletion decision overturned.
brenneman(t)(c) 12:40, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Edit #1000
[edit]Congrats! =) --Dvyost 03:46, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I'm almost a fourth of the way to catching you. :P Lord Bob 03:52, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- The way I've been going lately, you may find it easier than you expect... =) --Dvyost 04:13, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Featured article for December 25th
[edit]I noticed you have listed yourself in Category:Atheist Wikipedians. That said, you will probably be interested in my suggested featured article for December 25th: Omnipotence paradox. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is Christmas, although Raul654 has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-11-28 08:24
DYK
[edit]
|
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Raghib Ismail, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Classic Rock
[edit]Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most liked classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! RENTASTRAWBERRY FOR LET? röck 02:59, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Sour Grapes... wait! Now I get it!
[edit]
Thanks for voting to support my RfA. I wasn't expecting an unopposed promotion (I thought I'd hit some die-hard edit-counters at least) and I'm touched by the trust shown in me. I'll try my best to continue to earn that trust. But first, I'll have to work on not sounding like a politician; that last sentence was awful. Oh well. Let me know when I screw something up with the shiny new buttons. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
Toronto Argonauts history
[edit]Hi, I am just wondering if you know what the Toronto Argonauts helmets looked like in the 60's. I am creating the 1967 CFL season and I can't put a helmet on until I know the helmet accurately.
Thanks for your help -User Talk:Bestghuran
Thanks, Lord Bob, for supporting my RfA - I was truly touched by the confidence my fellow editors have shown in me, and well do my best as an admin to help make the dream of Wikipedia into a reality! BD2412 T 07:22, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
The Black List
[edit]I think that you should be informed that you are on the Black List. I wouldn't worry or anything if I were you, just conceal any personal information he doesn't have about you. No need to make things easy for banned users. Izehar (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- What is amusing is the way he takes the quotes out of context and misrepresents them. John Doe#16 22:43, 16 December 2005 (UTC) (what do you think of my signature - I'm trying it out)
My RFA
[edit] |
Thank you for voting for me at my RFA, which closed with a 24/1/1 outcome. I will do my best in the position I now am in. Thanks again, and see you around Wikipedia! |
--Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
hi, there is an organized campaign to save the above self-promotional vanity games-club page from deletion.... i'm wondering if you'd be willing to take a look and voice your opinion? normally i wouldnt care but (a) i hate organized campaigns from groups of users (especially when they have vested interests but dont declare them) and (b) when challenged about it, they suggested i try it myself! so here i am.... cheers! Zzzzz 20:43, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
edit conflict on TFD
[edit]You accidentally removed one of my votes in this edit: [2]. It's an easy mistake to make on such a busy page, but please be careful about it in the future. Thanks, FreplySpang (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Kids these days, wiki'ing in class! :-) No problem, just wanted to let you know. FreplySpang (talk) 19:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Stephen Harper as PM
[edit]- You might want this on your user page. -- AmeriCan 18:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Odd
[edit]I was looking at the scientology user box TfD and I saw something odd... I looked back and found everything had changed during [this edit. So, is it you browswer that transliterates Japanese characters or what? I just found that to be really odd. gren グレン ? 15:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- I figured it would have to be something like a browser since it happened with Misstress Selina's signature too... very odd though... what failure to read encoding would transliterate a word? (since the Japanese is just Gren in Japanesse characters). It's just funny since it was my signature but hopefully that won't happen on pages with Japanese characters. gren グレン ? 16:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]I would like to express my thanks to all the good people who spent their valuable time time and effort working on my (failed) RfA voting. Especially for those who actually voted to support me :). Lets move on and make together our Wikipedia an even greater place abakharev 09:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Articles For Deletion
[edit]Hi, a while ago you made some comments about the presence of bible-verse articles, and/or source texts of the bible, and you may therefore be interested in related new discussions:
- A discussion about 200 articles, one each for the first 200 verses of Matthew - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/200 verses of Matthew
- A discussion about 18 articles, one each for the first 18 verses of John 20 - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of John 20
- A discussion about whether or not the entire text of a whole bible chapter should be contained in the 6 articles concerning those specific chapters - Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Whole bible chapter text.
--Victim of signature fascism | Don't forget to vote in the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections 18:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikimedia Canada
[edit]Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for supporting my RfA. It was successful and I hope to be a good administrator. Essexmutant 11:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Canadian Military History Task Force
[edit]User:Task Force/Canadian Mil Hist notice
My RfA
[edit]
SoothingR 21:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)my RfA
[edit]Hi Lord Bob,
Just a quick (belated) note to express my thanks for your support in my RfA. You are right about images in sigs - WP:SIG makes this quite clear and I have altered my sig accordingly.
Anyway, as it stands I have around 70%, so I'll need a few more supports in order to get admin status. I have been quite disappointed that most of those in opposition seem to have disregarded the sentiments on my user page - but hey, that's life.
Thank you again for your support! DJR (Talk) 11:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Please vote
[edit]Hi. You voted in support of Alex Bakharev his previous RfA, and I just wanted to let you know that there's a second one at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alex Bakharev 2. --Khoikhoi 03:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:HMCS_Calgary_FFH-335.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:HMCS_Calgary_FFH-335.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Torino 2006 Women's Ice Hockey Semi-final Game Upset
[edit]Hello,
Just to clarify: I totally agree with you that it was an upset, I was just trying to prove my point when it was removed and another statement that was just as much (or rather, as little) POV was kept. The way I see it, when something that has never happened before and that no-one (not even the Swedes) had expected happens, it's clearly an upset, even from a neutral point of view. --x-Flare-x 05:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:HMCS_Charlottetown_FFH-339.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:HMCS_Charlottetown_FFH-339.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Question (moved from top of page)
[edit]re: "discussion is over, continue discussion on article talk page if you must" edit, here. where can i find the talk page you speak of? Validusername 04:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:HMCS_Fredericton_FFH-337.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:HMCS_Fredericton_FFH-337.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:HMCS_Ville_de_Quebec_FFH-332.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:HMCS_Ville_de_Quebec_FFH-332.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 22:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
This May Just Change Your vote On the Stephen Glicker thing
[edit]Steve's NDA on this has finally expired so now it's okay to talk about it. He Founded and Ran a multimillion Dollar company called supernova Inc. for 8 years. It has accounts with Disney, VISA, AT&T, MTV, Etc... (He recently sold it about a year or 2 ago) The site [3] I think this proves noteabillity.--Sgore 20:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Totally wrong about Messier
[edit]Number 4 on my list of the best Hockey players. Mind you, he is number 2 on my list of Centers.
Overall, in terms of who I'd want on a team to make a play-off push, he's behind a young Gretzky, a Devils/Early Avalanche Claude Lemiux and a right-now Henrik Lundqvist. Anyway, since theres always a shortage of Hockey fans, just thought I'd drop by and stir up trouble. -Mask 
01:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Whats your home town? I've lived pretty close to Canada my whole life (B.C. and the Yukon here in Alaska, and I spent some time in the American 25% of Sault Ste. Marie, of which Ontario gets 3/4ths. -Mask
01:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
You wrote:
"I feel a vague tingle when I think "somewhere in Poland, somebody sat down and said 'the world needs software to design cartoon buses.'" Unfortunately for the author, not a lot of people have thought the same thing, or this product might be notable. Delete."
- I love it! This is very funny. I would totally add it to my Crazy Russian Wikipedia Hall of Fame for Excellent Remarks - if I had one. Cheers, - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 17:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
ProhibitOnions's RfA
[edit]| Thank you, Lord Bob/Archive1! | ||
 |
...for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 58/2/0. If you have any comments, or need any new-admin help, please let me know here. ProhibitOnions 22:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC) | |
And thanks for the kind comments! Best wishes, ProhibitOnions 22:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Random high-five...
[edit]...for your taste in hockey teams and music. Oil in 7, baby! Doogie2K (talk) 00:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
YEA BABY GO OILERSMax.pwnage 20:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
I'd like to invite you to review and participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Daniel Brandt. This is not a request for your endorsement, simply a request for your participation in the discussion. Thank you. -- Malber (talk · contribs) 18:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Edmonton Oilers
[edit]Hello Mr. Bob, it has come to my attention that you have been disrespecting Michael Peca and Fernando Pisani. I would just like to let you know you should probably start watching the NHL playoffs on CBC, where you can see Peca/Pisani lighting up Ilya Bryzgalov. Without these two the Edmonton Oilers hopes for the stanley cup would be downed. What now?? Max.pwnage 19:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Team Canada
[edit]What do you all think of the Canadian National hockey team's performance this year. Who knows what in the Olympics and 4th in the recent World Hockey Championship. What is the Problem? For the WHC i believe the problem is the Edmonton Oilers are still in the playoffs making all of the Canadian players off of the Oilers roster uneligible to play. What is going on here? Is Canada being surpassed by all other countries in the sport of hockey?Max.pwnage 02:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Rklein.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Rklein.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Favorite Songs
[edit]My survey has changed. I am now continuing my mission for the best songs, but now I am accepting all genres. I'm giving you a chance to revote for your top ten favorite songs of any genres (not just classic rock which is still the best). I've made a executive decision to keep the existing survey results and just add on to that with the new entries. My feeling for doing this is because classic rock is the most influential genre in music currently so it should be expressed more in the survey. Thank you for contributing in the past, and hopefully in the future. ROCK ON. RENTASTRAWBERRY FOR LET? röck 03:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Long talk page
[edit]Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit long in the tooth - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! BD2412 T 00:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)