Talk:European archaeology
There seem to be far too much lists of archaeological sites around. There is a list of famous archaeological sites by country and a list of archaeological sites by continent and period, which I inandvertedly started. Is there any agreement on nesting (or deleting) lists? --Yak 16:35, Mar 16, 2004 (UTC)
- Two kinds of lists are useful: complete lists or weighted lists. (The rest are road-show David Letterman.) So go for it Yak! But better list titles are Most influential European archaeological sites with a one-sentence "why." Or-- dang what's the archaeologists' word for it?-- the Defining European archaeological sites i.e. Halstatt, or La Tene.
eponymous. But the eponymous sites are often not really important or even typical ones, Hallstatt being a notable exception.
--Yak 17:03, Mar 16, 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the European archaeology page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "European archaeology" page.
