User talk:Bwood

Multi-licensed into the public domain
I agree to multi-license my eligible text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions in the public domain, please check the multi-licensing guide.

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 03:02, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Prussian WikiProjects being considered for deletion

This is to inform you that three projects you created, Wikipedia:WikiProject Prussian Regierungsbezirke, Wikipedia:WikiProject Prussian provinces, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Prussian Kreise, are being considered for deletion. Please feel fee to take part in the discussion of these projects on the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion page. Thank you. Badbilltucker 18:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Weird Al" Yankovic

Your question about the link you posted probably can be handled here on the talk page. I reverted the link you added because it doesn't work. Looking at the page I think you meant, though, it's really nothing more than a fansite that doesn't add any new information. Also, I noticed right away that the first paragraph contains two factual errors. --Maxamegalon2000 17:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kreise of Posen District

I have proposed a change at Talk:Posen District that affects seven articles which you created. As you are the primary contributor to the articles and the article Posen District, I would value your input. Thanks, Black Falcon 05:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you don't mind, please reply at the article's talk page, so that any discussion is centralised there. -- Black Falcon 05:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Prussia

Hi Bwood. Great to see that you are back on Wikipedia. While you were away, WikiProject Prussia and its derivatives had lapsed into disuse. After I started up on Wikipedia, I (sort of) restated the main Prussia project - largely as a testing area for the wider-ranging WP Former Countries. I was unable to maintain all of the derivative projects and so I thought it would be easier to merge them back into the main project as sub-projects. The project is still not very active (WPFC takes up most of my time), but if you wish to get back into WP Prussia and help get it running again, I'd like to hear any suggestions that you may have.

Another thing, I was working on different versions of the Kreise navbar that you started on for Posen. My test version is here. I wanted to try come up with something that could be used for all provinces, so I made a similar one for the Rhine Province here. Neither are used yet, and I haven't done anything with them in a while. - 52 Pickup 19:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm probably only going to do damage control, protecting the important things. I'll finish updating the other 33 or so Kreise articles, as I can. I had to develop a series of regular expressions to convert the HTML from my wiki articles to convert the links. Your navbar looks great and has my blessing. Let's use it. Let me know where the greatest needs are for moving the WPFC project along and I'll try to assist.

btw, GoogleEarth has some untapped uses for supplemental article media. Layers and the polygon/path tools, for example, can show changing borders, troop movements. Maps can be imported and overlaid, with adjustable transparency. Bwood 14:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I've just changed the format of the navbar. The one that I made up for the Rhine Province doesn't really have enough articles to be fully used - I just wanted to test how the format works for other provinces.

At WPFC, most relevant articles have been tagged with the {{WPFC}} banner, but now it is necessary to assess them all. After that, the group can properly work together on improving the articles. If you would like to help out with that, that would be great. Other issues are the development of formats and content - this has taken up most of my work, particularly the Former Country and Former Subdivision infoboxes and monitoring their use. Do you have any thoughts on what can be done with WP Prussia? I was toying with the idea of turning it into a taskforce of WPFC since the project is still pretty small and is heavily overlapped with WPFC (plus support from the Germany and Poland WPs), but I'm not sure.

I'm pretty new to Google Earth, but I'm always looking out for new types of images. Thanks for that. - 52 Pickup 17:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Prussian counties of Posen

Hello.

I have introduced changes to your great work on Kreise in Posen Provinz. The policy on Wikipedia is that texts be in English, hence Kreise was changed to county, etc. Even if this does not reflect 100% of the original meaning, it's in English, and the linked article explains regional differences country-by-country. Same applies to "Stadtamt" - while it may be difficult to translate to English, it must be expressed in English, simply because of Wikipedia principles.

In a few articles I linked the names to articles using the present-day names of the towns, preserving German names as display names, and German sort order. This is, I believe, a sensible compromise between history and the need to identify these localities.

The NavPosenDistricts template was missing in a few articles. I don't know whether the missing template was your intention, or simply vandalism, so I restored it in each article.

Once again, big respect to your work on these historic localities.

LMB (talk) 10:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't agree with the changes in principal, but since I've given up contributing (and have had to force myself to not care), it is no big deal. As far as I'm concerned, some of Wikipedia's rules are often misguided and not in the best interest of the audience.

The missing template references were probably vandalism, but not as big a deal as the loss of so much useful data that the WikiNazis stripped out. If you want to really contribute, you could restore the vast tables of data (stripping out the links to the Posen website that contains even more useful information, to avoid incurring the wrath of the Machine). A word processor could make the process semi-automatic.

Best of luck, thanks for the kind words, hope to see the articles improved in a positve direction someday. Feel free to copy anything from the wiki that I'm working on (see the links in the deleted material of any Kreis article). Of course it would take one person over a year working day and night, to transfer it all, but since you can't link to it...Bwood (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:ArticleMapPrussianProvinces

A tag has been placed on Template:ArticleMapPrussianProvinces requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kreis Birnbaum

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kreis Birnbaum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kreis Birnbaum. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kreis Adelnau

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kreis Adelnau, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kreis Adelnau. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Germans To America (book)

A tag has been placed on Germans To America (book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Non-dropframe (talk) 06:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kolmar oldBldgsa.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kolmar oldBldgsa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bromberg Brahe01.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bromberg Brahe01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How to report widespread commercial spam

Hello, Bwood. You have new messages at Black Falcon's talk page.
Message added 19:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

File:KolmarHills.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:KolmarHills.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|Bwood}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:RawitschWindmills1899.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:RawitschWindmills1899.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bwood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]